Showing posts with label Scarry-Elaine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Scarry-Elaine. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 18, 2016

Send the Summary Edition of "Thermonuclear Monarchy" to YOUR Member of Congress!

No US president acting alone -- be it Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, or anyone else -- can be trusted with the sole power to launch nuclear weapons.

Summary Edition of
Thermonuclear Monarchy:
Choosing Between Democracy and Doom

by Elaine Scarry
A Summary Edition of Thermonuclear Monarchy: Choosing Between Democracy and Doom by Elaine Scarry (my sister) is now available and is being widely used in educational, policy, and other settings. It contains the full introduction to each of the main parts of the complete edition of Thermonuclear Monarchy.

In a recent Huffington Post article, John Carl Baker discussed the current state of affairs in the US -- one that many US citizens are finally waking up to: "In the United States, the president has the absolute authority to launch a nuclear attack. He or she doesn’t have to seek approval from the legislative branch, the public, or anyone else. If the president wills Armageddon, there’s effectively no way to stop it from happening." Baker continues by saying,

Harvard professor Elaine Scarry dubs this authoritarian state of affairs a “thermonuclear monarchy,” and she argues that it calls into question the United States’ foundational republicanism. You can probably see her point. For a country that fought a war of independence against tyrannical King George, it’s a bit strange that we give a single individual total control over an arsenal of apocalyptic death machines. But legally, there are no constraints on the president’s ability to launch a war that could wreck the planet for generations. I don’t know about you, but I kind of like it here - shouldn’t we at least get to vote on that?

(See "Beyond Clinton or Trump: Nuclear Weapons and Democracy")

Contents for the Summary Edition of Thermonuclear Monarchy:

Introduction: The Floor of the World
Part One: The United States Constitution Outlaws Nuclear Weapons
Part Two: The Social Contract Outlaws Nuclear Weapons
Part Three: Everyday Consent and Emergency Deliberation
Conclusion: Against Us All
Notes

Get a copy of the Summary Edition of Thermonuclear Monarchy today, and maybe even give one to a friend. (Your member of Congress?)


More . . .

Elaine Scarry demonstrates that the power of one leader to obliterate millions of people with a nuclear weapon - a possibility that remains very real even in the wake of the Cold War - deeply violates our constitutional rights, undermines the social contract, and is fundamentally at odds with the deliberative principles of democracy.

(See Reviews of "Thermonuclear Monarchy: Choosing Between Democracy and Doom" by Elaine Scarry )










Representative Ted Lieu and Senator Ed Markey have introduced the "Restricting First Use of Nuclear Weapons Act of 2016."  Here's how you can get on the phone to your member of Congress to demand their support . . . .

(See NUKES: Your Call to Your Congressman Matters)

Thursday, February 27, 2014

Reviews of "Thermonuclear Monarchy: Choosing Between Democracy and Doom" by Elaine Scarry

Thermonuclear Monarchy:
Choosing Between Democracy and Doom
by Elaine Scarry

Purchase on Amazon
Publisher page
Below are links to reviews, interviews, excerpts, event info, and related material for Thermonuclear Monarchy: Choosing Between Democracy and Doom by Elaine Scarry, my sister.

“That we have escaped disaster so far is a near miracle. Scarry’s remarkable contribution should inspire us to abolish this colossal folly.”

Noam Chomsky

“. . . urgent and lucid . . . [a] prolonged rallying cry of a book.”

Kenneth Baker, San Francisco Chronicle

“ Elaine Scarry is right: Americans live in a thermonuclear monarchy.”

Kennette Benedict, Bulletin of Atomic Scientists

“Scarry’s assault on the reigning complacency about nuclear weapons rests on her belief in the capacity of an interpretation to reconfigure the world.”

Nathan Schneider, Chronicle of Higher Education

“Thermonuclear Monarchy is a work of deadly serious political science by an analyst dwelling on the constitutional implications of giving a democratically elected president sovereign-like autocracy.”

Nick Smith, Engineering and Technology (U.K.)

“Scarry’s book requires any thoughtful reader to revisit the basic postulates and the deepest human purposes of our system of government.”

Laurence H. Tribe, professor of constitutional law, Harvard Law School

Thermonuclear Monarchy:
Choosing Between Democracy and Doom
by Elaine Scarry

Purchase on Amazon
Publisher page
“A really remarkable work, ranging across ethics, law, and politics to pose genuinely radical challenges to the confused and potentially lethal systems that pass for democracy in our world.”

Rowan Williams, master of Magdalene College, Cambridge, and former Archbishop of Canterbury

“Elaine Scarry offers a coruscating critique of current policies, arguing that they are antithetic to the spirit of the U.S. constitution, and indeed to basic democratic principles. . . . [The] book offers a compelling case for swifter progress toward their elimination.”

Martin Rees, Astronomer Royal (UK)

“I congratulate Elaine Scarry on her intellectual courage and moral clarity, and in proposing the only possible way out.”

Marcelo Gleiser, author of A Tear at the Edge of Creation





AUDIO PRESENTATIONS

Elaine Scarry presentation at MIT, September 30, 2014, part of "Understanding the Call to Eliminate Nuclear Weapons" (Elaine Scarry presentation begins at 35:15)


REVIEWS AND COMMENTARY

February 10, 2014, Nick Smith in Engineering and Technology Magazine: "Command and Control/Thermonuclear Monarchy"[Two very different but equally revealing reviews of the legacy of the Cold War are among our pick of the new technology books]

February 17, 2014, Nathan Schneider in The Chronicle of Higher Education: "A Literary Scholar's Voice in the Wilderness: Elaine Scarry fights American complacency about nuclear arms"

February 24, 2014, Kennette Benedict in Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists: "Can true democracy exist in a nuclear weapon state?"

March/April 2014, Craig Lambert in Harvard Magazine: "Nuclear Weapons or Democracy: 'Out of ratio' weapons are essentially ungovernable"

(undated), Steve Donoghue in Open Letters Monthly: "The Danelaw" [Review of Thermonuclear Monarchy: Choosing Between Democracy and Doom]



March 7, 2014, David Swanson on Washington's Blog: "Thermonuclear Monarchy"

March 21, 2014, Richard Rhodes in the New York Times: "Absolute Power: ‘Thermonuclear Monarchy,’ by Elaine Scarry"

April 30, 2014, on the Gleebooks website: "Thermonuclear Monarchy"

May 7, 2014, John Myers on the Personal Liberty Digest website: "Obama And Putin Have A Holocaust On Their Hands; Steps You Must Take To Survive"

May 23, 2014, Mark J. Palmer on the Earth Island Journal website: "The Decision to Wage Nuclear War Should Rest With the Body Politic, Argues Author"

June 20, 2014, discussed in Simon Waxman on the Al Jazeera America website: " Americans support the Obama Doctrine: Popular approval for the president’s conciliatory approach matters more than accusations of weakness"

August, 2014, Rosalie G. Riegle in Sojourners: "A Reign of Terror"

October 14, 2014, Jonathon Sturgeon on Flavorwire: "10 Mind-Altering Philosophy Books from 2014 "

Undated, Jasmine Farrier in Law and Politics Book Review (Sponsored by the Law and Courts Section of the American Political Science Association): "Thermonuclear Monarchy: Choosing Between Democracy and Doom" [book review]


INTERVIEWS

"The Contradiction of Nuclear Democracy" - Simon Waxman in the Boston Review

"On Thermonuclear Monarchy: An Interview with Elaine Scarry" - by Sarah Gerard in The American Reader

"Elaine Scarry: The U.S. Constitution Bans Nukes" - by David Swanson on Talk Nation Radio

"Interview with Elaine Scarry, author of 'Thermonuclear Monarchy'" - by Kenneth Baker in SFGate

"Are we numb to Nukes?" - Christopher Lyden on Radio Open Source


RELATED ARTICLES BY ELAINE SCARRY

"Why We Must Disarm the U.S.’s Unprecedented Nuclear Arsenal" - Elaine Scarry in TIME, August 5, 2014




EXCERPTS

"The floor of the world"- in Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, March 2014 (subscription site)


 

EVENTS

Saturday, March 15, 2014, 3:45 p.m. -- Boston, MA -- Boston College, Stokes Hall, S195 - Keynote Address by Elaine Scarry, Harvard University, "The Floor of the World." Respondent: Paulo Barrozo, Boston College Law School. (Part of the conference, On Violence: Ethical, Political and Aesthetic Perspectives)

Tuesday, March 18, 2014, 7:30 p.m. -- McMinnville, OR -- Linfield College, 900 SE Baker St Elaine Scarry, Harvard University, "The Floor of the World."


Thursday, March 27, 2014, 5:00 p.m. -- Washington, DC -- George Washington University, Elliott School of International Affairs, Room 505, 1957 E St NW Elaine Scarry, Harvard University, "Thermonuclear Monarchy: Choosing Between Democracy and Doom". Elaine Scarry demonstrates that the power of one leader to obliterate millions of people with a nuclear weapon - a possibility that remains very real even in the wake of the Cold War - deeply violates our constitutional rights, undermines the social contract, and is fundamentally at odds with the deliberative principles of democracy. RSVP: http://go.gwu.edu/thermonuclear Sponsored by the Center for International Science and Technology Policy

Thursday, April 3, 2014, 6:00 p.m. -- Cambridge, MA -- Harvard University, TSAI Auditorium, CGIS South, Room S010, 1730 Cambridge Street - Elaine Scarry on her new book, Thermonuclear Monarchy: Choosing Between Democracy and Doom. with responses by Philip C. Bobbitt, Herbert Wechsler Professor of Federal Jurisprudence, Columbia Law School, and Charles Fried, Beneficial Professor of Law, Harvard Law School.


August 6, 2014
Boston Remembers Hiroshima and Nagasaki:
Moving from Violence to Unity

Tuesday, September 30, 2014, 7:00 p.m. -- Cambridge, MA -- MIT Stata Center (Room 32-155), 32 Vassar Street - Understanding the Call to Eliminate Nuclear Weapons: Jim Walsh and Elaine Scarry. In November 2013, the UN Disarmament Committee passed a resolution establishing the International Day for the Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons. This event is held in answer to that call. (Audio - Elaine Scarry presentation begins at 35:15)

Saturday, November 8, 2014, Cambridge, MA -- MIT Room 34-101 • 50 Vassar St. - Presentation at A Foreign Policy for All: Re-Thinking U.S. Foreign Policy for the 21st Century

Thursday, November 13, 2014, 6:00 p.m. -- New York, NY -- Graduate Center CUNY (Room C204-205), 365 5th Avenue - The Making and Breaking of Cities - Presentation at Abiding Cities, Remnant Sites: A Conference hosted by the Dept of Comparative Literature, CUNY.

Sunday, January 11, 2015, 4:00 p.m. -- Chicago, IL -- Wellington Ave. UCC, 615 W Wellington - Thermonuclear Monarchy: Book Talk  - Chicago Area Peace Action event.

Also by Elaine Scarry


The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World (1987)

"Stunningly original, enormously important, powerfully written....The beauty of her writing is that she can make us see torture and war as we have never seen them before, read the Bible and Marx as we have never read them before--indeed, see our day-to-day world in a usefully new manner."--Eric J. Cassell, M.D., Cornell Medical Center

"An extraordinary book: large-spirited, heroically truthful. A necessary book."--Susan Sontag

"An absolutely astonishing achievement...I believe it will change many lives, not by persuasion, but by widening the scope of consciousness. The book itself is a great act of courage, intelligence, and style."--Allen Grossman, Brandeis University


Rule of Law, Misrule of Men (2010)

"Excoriating and elegant, Elaine Scarry takes us to the big issues: why the rule of law matters, what went wrong, and what is needed to put it right." Philippe Sands, author of Lawless World and Torture Team, Professor of Law, University College London

"Some of the most trenchant and passionate analysis of the politics of democracy and terror in the United States. These essays are a searing call to conscience, an eloquent plea for justice, and a damning indictment of the Bush administration's response to 9/11." David Cole, Professor of Law, Georgetown University, coauthor of Less Safe, Less Free: Why America Is Losing the War on Terror



On Beauty
and Being Just

(2001)
Thinking in an
Emergency

(2012)
Dreaming by the Book
(2001)

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

Guantanamo Detainees are Human Beings

In the days ahead, people all over the country will turn their attention to the plight of men entombed at Guantanamo.

I wrote a few days ago about how, despite a handful of releases by the US government, the key fact is that approximately 150 men who never should have been at Guantanamo in the first place remain stuck there, with no indication that they will ever receive anything close to justice.

More Guantanamo detainee art at
"The Hauntingly Beautiful Artwork Of Guantanamo Detainees"

Today, I am dedicating some time to trying to appreciate the humanity of the men at Guantanamo.  So much of the story of Guantanamo has been the program of the US government to make Guantanamo detainees the object of hate.  They have been characterized as "the worst of the worst," with no basis in any kind of legal finding of fact or law. They have been Exhibit #1 in the "Empire of Fear" that our government has constructed.

It will be the work of many years to restore the humanity of the people who have been tortured in our name through their detention at Guantanamo. We must find ways to turn our backs on the propaganda about these men and learn something about them as people. 

The artwork on in this post is selected from the article "The Hauntingly Beautiful Artwork Of Guantanamo Detainees".   I've selected just two of the many examples shown there.

The first shows the inside of a cell. I invite you to look closely at how the color is applied. The layering, the variegation, the approach to representing shadow via color; they all suggest a person using their creative powers to the utmost to find human experience in what is intended to be nothing more than a featureless cell in a dungeon.

More Guantanamo detainee art at
"The Hauntingly Beautiful Artwork Of Guantanamo Detainees"

The second is a still life - a tea set. This one seemed particularly important to me because of something I read years ago in the book by my sister, Elaine Scarry - The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. In it, she explained that torture is about destroying the entire world of the tortured person, and often torture is carried out by using domestic objects -- the things that usually tell us that our lives are safe and secure -- to terrorize and inflict pain.

There can be no greater evidence of this than the way the act of feeding has been transformed by the program of force-feeding Guantanamo hunger strikers: "feeding" has gone from being a life-giving nurturance to a world-destroying act of inflicting pain.

So, as I look at this tea set, I imagine someone reclaiming the domestic space for themselves -- rebuilding their world. I have only a vague idea of the signficance of the small tea glasses, and the tea pots (why are there two?), and I don't really know about the decanter on the right.  I love the brilliantly-colored carpet hanging on the wall, though its not a type I particularly recognize.  The point, of course, is that whether or not I fully understand the meaning of these objects, they probably hold immense meaning in the world of the person who painted them.

More Guantanamo detainee art at
"The Hauntingly Beautiful Artwork Of Guantanamo Detainees"
There's a lot to see in these pictures. Please spend some time reflecting on them this year as part of your January 11 observance.


Related posts


It is clearly the time for an annual dose of stealth maneuvering by our government's "national security" apparatus, led by the President.  They're hoping that they can make it look like Guantanamo is "going away." According to the Administration's script, Americans are supposed to yawn and go back to sleep. Instead, we need to be saying: how do we take responsibility for the injury we have caused?

(See A Modest Proposal: Resettle the Guantanamo Detainees in Chicago)



In 2013 America, we have been conditioned to feel anything associated with Middle Eastern and/or Muslim men should trigger feelings of suspicion, fear, and hatred. And when those cues are triggered, all of our objectivity and healthy skepticism goes out the window.

(See Orwell and the Uses of Hate)









My most prominent memory of my first viewing of the Guantanamo film, The Response, is of one of the stars of the film -- Kate Mulgrew of Star Trek fame -- participating in a panel after the screening. I was blown away when she said, "I did this because our civil liberties in our country have been gravely damaged and we all need to contribute to repairing them."

(See Understanding What Guantanamo Means)

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Fed Up With Being Spied On

[Part of the series: 2013 = 1984?]


"There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork." (George Orwell, 1984 - p.2)

Edward J. Snowden has forced us to confront what we all knew already: our government is running wild and we can't get our privacy back, short of some kind of very extreme change.

For a long time, many of us have been shrugging off the probability that our Facebook posts and other social media were being seen by the government; we joked about hearing strange sounds on the phone lines and the possibility that our meeting rooms were bugged. We remarked over the ubiquitous cameras in Chicago and other cities. We had a vague sense that the government's computer and communications system power were far beyond anything we could really understand.

But Snowden has stuck it in our face, and now -- like Winston Smith in 1984 -- we're being challenged to confront it. Do we really want a world in which our own affairs are 100% transparent to the government? Can't we push back?


And that's just the half of it. My sister, Elaine Scarry, has written about how things have gotten turned on their head in Transparent Citizens, Invisible Government: "The Patriot Act inverts the constitutional requirement that people's lives be private and the work of government officials be public; it instead crafts a set of conditions in which our inner lives become transparent and the workings of the government become opaque. Either one of these outcomes would imperil democracy; together they not only injure the country but also cut off the avenues of repair."

The problem is not that we are living our lives in public. People are entitled to be "out" without fearing that the facts of their lives will be abused.


We have a problem with our government. It sees opportunities for power in every bit and byte of our personal data, and it's time to call it what it is: wrong.

We've been fortunate to have some modern-day Paul Reveres -- Bradley Manning and now Edward J. Snowden -- to raise the alarm. Now it's up to us to rise to the call.


For more on the surveillance state: Read 1984.

(1984 page references are to the 2009 Plume paperback edition.) 

Related posts

A large number of people are marked for exclusion and deprivation -- and worse -- because they have characteristics that are susceptible to the whole apparatus of power:  they are easily recognizable as  NOT "normal" or "right" or "acceptable" . . . under the gaze of surveillance this condition is recorded and propagated . . . for perpetual recording and processing within the data centers of power . . . accompanied by intermittent acts of physical and cultural injury -- random, senseless -- to reinforce their unshakeable status. 

(See Drone Gaze, Drone Injury: The War on Communities of Color)


One issue that has a key place in the midterm elections in 2014, I believe, is surveillance.  With each passing day, I am hearing more and more people say that the surveillance issue is something that a wide spectrum of people are deeply upset about. That includes people on the right as well as people on the left -- people who don't usually talk with each other, much less work together for positive change!

(See The Surveillance Issue: The Fulcrum of the 2014 Election?)


There has been a good sign in 2013, in that many people have become outraged about government surveillance. A recent Pew poll found that Americans are now more worried about civil liberties abuses than terrorism. I believe a big question in 2014 will be whether challengers successfully address the issue of NSA surveillance in their campaigns.

(See What Will Election 2014 Boil Down To? )


Wednesday, December 9, 2009

The World Turned Upside Down - Huff Post, Wash Post, and Twitter

"The World turn'd upside down"
A month or so back, I said I was bound and determined to figure out "this Twitter thing." Recent work I've been doing to promote the great Guantanamo film The Response has opened my eyes about Twitter, and a lot of other things . . .

I've been having a lot of little "Aha!" moments as I try to get the word out about screenings of The Response on Twitter. For one thing, I discovered that there is a whole group of people who are actively passing along the latest news about Guantanamo (and a whole range of other civic affairs), and they can be found by searching on Twitter. That in turn leads you to certain "hubs" who distribute and redistribute ("retweet") the news on a particular topic. The interaction between the hubs and the "spokes" allows for incredibly rapid dissemination (and *digestion*) of the right information by the right people at the right speed.

Hence, a big event for me was asking one of those "hubs," GuantanamoAndy, to spread the word . . . and within minutes seeing:

Tymlee RT @Tosfm: @GuantanamoAndy Excellent film on Gitmo - #TheResponse - shortlisted for Oscar in shorts film category - http://bit.ly/6HQFDM ...

heyjude408 RT @Tosfm: @GuantanamoAndy Excel. film on Gitmo - #TheResponse - shortlisted for Oscar in shorts film cat.- http://bit.ly/6HQFDM - Pls RT

Tosfm @GuantanamoAndy Excellent film on Gitmo - #TheResponse - shortlisted for Oscar in shorts film category - http://bit.ly/6HQFDM - Pls RT


My messages have also been faithfully re-tweeted by "Satyagraha_ji" -- who has 3,672 followers on Twitter, all of whom, one can infer, are interested in social justice issues associated with Gandhi's concept of satyagraha.

The world really is changing -- public discourse is being shaped in an entirely new way. And from where I sit, it looks like power really is getting back into the hands of ordinary people! For about the past 20 years, my sister, Elaine Scarry, has been talking about the model of Paul Revere for how we manage information in a democracy. Now I finally understand how very true that is!

Another eye-opener for me has been the way in-person meetings, blogs, individual websites, Facebook, and Twitter all interact together. To get a taste of that, just decode this Twitter post:

hoffman4IL An earnest, skeptical voter in Evanston gives @hoffman4IL a chance, and becomes a supporter: http://bit.ly/6thAu2. Thanks, @Scarry!

This post is by the Hoffman for Illinois ("hoffman4IL") campaign, telling its followers about a blog post ("http://bit.ly/6thAu2") by me ("an earnest, skeptical voter in Evanston") describing how I became a supporter, and indicate my Twitter address ("@Scarry") at the end. Hoffman is going to be great for Illinois, not least of all because he understands how to use new media to pull people into the conversation.

But the biggest single eye-opener for me came this morning when I was trading emails with Washington Post reporter Peter Slevin. I expressed amazement at the 286 comments that people had appended to his piece on the use of the Thomson Correctional Center to house Guantanamo detainees. (That's a lotta comments!) Peter said, "Yeah, well, that one got picked up by the Huff Post . . . ."

The Huff Post? Determining who talks about an article in the Wash Post? About a issue in northwest Illinois?

The World turn'd upside down:
OR
A briefe description of the ridiculous Fashions
of these distracted Times
By T.J. a well-willer to King, Parliament and Kingdom
London: Printed for John Smith 1646


Maybe it's because the Paul Revere metaphor was fresh in my mind, but Peter's story, and the 286 response, and the role of new outlets like the Huff Post in changing the whole game, reminded me of the history fact we learned in high school: about how at the surrender of the British to the American forces at Yorktown, the band played an old tune called "The World Turned Upside Down."

Well, if this is another revolution, I for one am all for it. (It turned out pretty good the first time . . . . )

(For more on the Thomson story, see "Why Illinois is Central to America's Response to Guantanamo.")


Related posts

I've started to organize some of the practices I've discovered, starting with the ten "guideposts" below. I'll expand on these from time to time, and hope to spur continued conversation with all of you!

(See Twitter: Scarry's Ten Guideposts )












As I read the article, I kept hearing echoes of lessons that I have been learning in the last several years as I have worked to communicate online about peace and justice issues. Herewith the top of my hit parade, with reference to stories from the USA Today newsroom . . . .

(See Social Media: If It's Good Enough for USA Today, It's Good Enough for Me )





I've realized that when we ask ourselves, "What is it that we hope people will do?" we must include an element of recursivity: One of the things we want people to do is to involve more people in doing it. In a way, that element of recursivity -- dare I say "evangelism"? -- defines what it means for people to really become part of a movement.

(See Invite More People into Activism! (Pass It Along!) )