The NATO summit fueled pessimism on US-Russia cooperation for nuclear disarmament; but things could change in an instant and Putin and Obama could sit down together. Maybe we need to demand it?
In the last 48 hours there were two pieces, both in the Washington Post, both by Josh Rogin:
"Obama plans major nuclear policy changes in his final months"
"Obama’s Syria plan teams up American and Russian forces"
Apparently Secretary of State Kerry is in Moscow for talks as I write this.
Now . . . what's the over/under on an Obama-Putin meeting on nuclear weapons before November? (Or better yet, before the August 6 Hiroshima anniversary??)
(For more background, here's the A-B-C on why Obama needs to go to Moscow to negotiate nuclear disarmament.)
Today, we may not be seeing kinetic (currently unleashed) violence on anything like the scale that consumed Europe and other parts of the
world and resulted in 60 million deaths. Instead, thanks to technology, we have potential (waiting to be unleashed) violence -- nuclear devastation just the push of a button away.
(See Obama's (and Putin's) Missed Opportunity at Hiroshima)
There are three centers of power that will impact nuclear disarmament: the President, the Congress, and the people. One of them will have to make nuclear disarmament happen.
(See Countdown to U.S. Nuclear Disarmament (With or Without the Politicians) )