They act as if the U.S. entry into Iraq is unlikely to be helpful.
Don't they believe the U.S. knows what it's doing?
![]() |
"Medicine is not an exact science, but we're learning all the time . . . " watch video of Theodoric of York, Medieval Barber |
It worked out so well the last time . . . .
Related posts
Isn't "adviser" just another word for "pre-escalation"?
(See Military Advisers to Iraq: What Could Go Wrong?)
"Humanitarian intervention" -- the great pretext for US intervention in Africa. Glenn Greenwald gave an outstanding talk in Chicago in May, 2012, in which he warned against humanitarian interventions: "The US -- no, everybody -- always says the reason for military intervention is 'humanitarian.' . . . "
(See Greenwald Was Right: "Humanitarian" War in Syria? It's Just More War)
The U.S. can get more "bang for the buck" out of each pair of boots it puts on the ground, because -- through the magic of robotics -- it can back up those boots with Hellfire missiles and 500-lb. bombs. For the folks back home, it helps maintain the illusion that the U.S. isn't really intervening in a way that risks escalation. For the population of the affected areas of Iraq, it helps maintain the balance of terror -- because those armed drones are just part of a much larger fleet of drones that is patrolling the skies over Baghdad. ("Is that drone overhead aiming . . . or just 'looking'?" From the ground, one has to assume they're all aiming . . . . )
(See Armed Drones Over Iraq: A Force Multiplier (Which Is Precisely Why They Are So Dangerous) )
No comments:
Post a Comment